[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:43:58 +0200 |
>> explicitly instead of using an action alist `(window-height
>> . fit-window-to-buffer)'?
>
> IIUC that would mean that it couldn't be configured via
> display-buffer-alist, right?
Obviously. Do we want to control filling via `display-buffer'?
Anyway, the output happens via `with-output-to-temp-buffer' which has no
direct means to pass an appropriate action to `display-buffer'. If we
used `with-temp-buffer-window' instead, we could pass an ACTION argument
to fill the buffer according to the size of the window used instead of
adjusting the window to the buffer size. In that case the configuration
could be controlled via `display-buffer-alist'.
martin
- bug#17831: 24.4.50; bad default value for `Man-width', (continued)
- bug#17831: 24.4.50; bad default value for `Man-width', Juri Linkov, 2014/06/24
- bug#17831: 24.4.50; bad default value for `Man-width', martin rudalics, 2014/06/25
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Juri Linkov, 2014/06/24
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, martin rudalics, 2014/06/25
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Juri Linkov, 2014/06/26
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/26
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Juri Linkov, 2014/06/27
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, martin rudalics, 2014/06/28
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Juri Linkov, 2014/06/29
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, martin rudalics, 2014/06/27
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, Juri Linkov, 2014/06/27
- bug#17809: 24.4.50; Completions display, martin rudalics, 2014/06/28