|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | bug#17871: 24.4.50; (elisp) `Core Advising Primitives': interactive spec as function? |
Date: | Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:49:22 -0700 (PDT) |
> > That *excludes* a sexp that returns a function. > > We're not talking about a sexp that returns a function, but a sexp which > *is* a function. What does that change? The `interactive' doc does not cover that either, AFAICT.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |