[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19479: Copyright issue (was: Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerab
From: |
Kelly Dean |
Subject: |
bug#19479: Copyright issue (was: Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable) |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:59:54 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> You're one of the very rare oddballs who can't
>>> be bothered to sign a trivial document to get this out of the way
>> That's not true. I offered to sign a document saying my work is PD.
>
> I didn't mean "a trivial document" in the sense "any trivial document",
> but rather "the particular trivial document that everybody else signed".
The FSF doesn't have just one document for contributors; it has multiples,
three of which I linked to in my previous message, and at least two more that
are for assignment instead of disclaimer (one for only past contributions, and
one for past and future contributions).
More than two years ago, I asked the copyright clerk to send me a disclaimer
form to sign. He refused. This is the _only_ reason that the FSF doesn't
already have a disclaimer on file for me.
If I sign an assignment document (i.e. saying that I own intellectual property
for my work and that I'm assigning that ownership to the FSF), then I would
just be committing perjury, because I don't own PD works. Nothing I sign can
remove anything from the public domain.
Again, please don't conflate two separate issues:
0. The FSF is refusing new PD code in Emacs. (I would be happy to learn that
I'm mistaken about this.)
1. My code is PD. (In case the FSF disputes this fact, I'm attaching a signed
document to establish it.)
Because the clerk refused to send me anything to sign that would establish #1
to the FSF's satisfaction, today I printed, signed, and scanned the attached
document based on the disclaimer forms the FSF has published, to make it
abundantly clear that my work is PD and that the FSF is free to use my work
with no legal restrictions whatsoever.
I'm also CCing it to assign@gnu.org, even though at this point I assume the
clerk will come up with some excuse to reject it.
If the clerk feels this doesn't make #1 clear enough, then please tell me what
needs to change. Even better, send me the exact disclaimer form you want me to
sign, which I asked for in the first place.
I repeat: nothing I sign can remove anything from the public domain. So nothing
I sign can assign to the FSF ownership of my work; if assignment is what the
FSF insists on, then it's asking for the impossible.
The attached document is to establish #1 to the FSF's satisfaction. The FSF
alone has the ability to solve #0; it has nothing to do with me.
Here's the text of the attached document:
This document is derived from the following sources:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/disclaim.manual
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/disclaim.program
I, Kelly Dean, American citizen and resident, hereby disclaim all patent,
copyright, and all other forms of intellectual property ownership of and
interest in all of my patches, software manuals, software programs, source
code, documentation, revisions thereof, and all other works, past, present, and
future, that I sent or will send to the emacs-devel@gnu.org or
bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org mailing lists, to 19479@debbugs.gnu.org, to any other
mailing list or email address at gnu.org or any subdomain thereof, or to any
developer or maintainer of GNU Emacs or any other GNU software, from my
previous (no longer active) email address of kellydeanch@yahoo.com, my current
email address of kelly@prtime.org, or any other email address.
I affirm that I have no other proprietary interest that would undermine this
release, and will do nothing to undermine it in the future. I represent that
all of the aforementioned works are my own and not a copy of someone else's
work, except where sources are cited. Patches include citations and partial
copies of the works to which the patches apply.
I created all of the works exclusively on my own time. They are not works made
for hire, and there's no educational institution, employer, or any other
organization or person who owns them. I do not have any agreement with any
person or organization saying he or it owns programs I write, and I did not
have any such agreement when I created any of the aforementioned works.
All of the works are permanently and irrevocably in the public domain.
Kelly Dean
kelly@prtime.org
January 8, 2015
gnu-disclaimer.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/01
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/04
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/04
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/04
- bug#19479: [PATCH] Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/07
- bug#19479: [PATCH] Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Glenn Morris, 2015/01/07
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/08
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/08
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/08
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/08
- bug#19479: Copyright issue (was: Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable),
Kelly Dean <=
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, David Kastrup, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/10
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/10
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/01/11
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/12