bug#19865: tar-untar-buffer: should honor default-directory

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net>
> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:32:59 +0000
> 
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov  Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:57:36 +0000
> 
>  >> Well, let’s see if I can reword the report.
> 
>  > If all you want is for me to stop bothering you with comments, all
>  > you need is just ask.  There's no need to have the bug reports
>  > reworded around my comments.
> 
>       All I want is to get the issue (that is: the misbehavior of
>       tar-untar-buffer with respect to the tar-mode buffer value of
>       default-directory) fixed.
> 
>       From where I stand, the shortest way there seems to get either
>       of my two patches approved (that is: at least a single OK and no
>       NAKs), so that I can safely push it.  If there’s any other way I
>       should be aware of – I’d like to hear about it.
> 
>       My understanding is that the Stefan’s comment is an OK (for a
>       former patch), while your request for “someone third to resolve
>       the tie” is a NAK (please correct me if it’s not.)

It is only a NAK if it's respected.  I cannot force anyone here to do
anything, I don;t have that power.

>       I appreciate the comments regarding the possible new “explicit
>       destination directory” feature, and I guess I can work on a
>       possible implementation once /this/ issue – and also #19481 –
>       are fixed.  However, I believe that such a new feature is no
>       substitute for a proper fix to this bug.

I obviously disagree, but whatever.