[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 16:51:31 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>, 24518@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:15:01 +0200
>
> Does it actually make sense to have to specify the character by its
> code?
Like I said: it looks a kludge, but it definitely isn't an accident.
I suggested to replace 'P' with 'c' in the interactive spec, to make
it less kludgey.
> That doesn't look like this was an intented feature (being
> undocumented).
It's documented, see the doc string.
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/23
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- bug#24518: 25.2.50; dired-mark-extension with prefix arg fails, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24