[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24738: 26.0.50; Incorrect Edebug spec for seq-let
|
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
|
Subject: |
bug#24738: 26.0.50; Incorrect Edebug spec for seq-let |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:31:39 +0200 |
Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com> writes:
>> Why sexp instead of form for the first argument?
>
> Because it doesn't get evaluated and shouldn't be instrumented.
Hmm, indeed :)
I'll apply your changes, thanks!
Cheers,
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature