[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26623: 24.5; bad variable name: `inside-post-command-hook'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#26623: 24.5; bad variable name: `inside-post-command-hook' |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:18:51 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> No, it's the other way around: a hook variable should have its name
> end in "-hook", but not every symbol whose name ends in "-hook" is a
> hook variable.
I think it is a good idea to avoid making more variables that are not
hooks but have names which suggest they were hooks. Let's aim to have
-hook mean it's a hook.
Perhaps `inside-post-command-hook-call' is a good name for this
variable.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.