|
From: | John Wiegley |
Subject: | bug#27919: 25.2.50; dired + eshell-ls: fallback to external ls fails |
Date: | Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:46:14 -0700 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.2.50 (darwin) |
>>>>> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes: > Why is it desirable to use eshell ls with dired instead of ls-lisp? Maybe it > would be better to remove it rather than fix it. (It usually goes well when > I suggest this...) I like it more than ls-lisp, and it pays attention to all the same options you can use to configure eshell/ls at the Eshell command-line. If anything, why not get rid of ls-lisp? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |