[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:57:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:36 AM, João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>> Seems to be there for a reason, unfortunately. It's forward
>>>> referenced in electric.el if I'm not mistaken.
>>>
>>> I don't understand this: electric.el is preloaded, so why would it
>>> need the autoload?
>
> I think you have the direction backwards: electric.el uses the
> autoloaded variable *from* elec-pair.el.
You mean Eli has the direction backwards. I don't have a clue :-)
> As far as I know, the only way to be sure of testing all dependencies
> is deleting all elc files, i.e., a full bootstrap minus the C
> compilation (using ccache can help automate the "minus the C
> compilation" part).
So is 'find . -iname "*.elc" | xargs rm -f' enough? What's ccache?
>> And then there's the problem Noam mentioned in elisp-mode.el.
>
> The elisp-mode.el problem is what causes the align.elc failure: the
> byte compiler uses elisp-mode.
Does this mean you sign off on both patches?
João
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, João Távora, 2017/08/17
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, npostavs, 2017/08/17
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, João Távora, 2017/08/17
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, npostavs, 2017/08/17
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, Reuben Thomas, 2017/08/18
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, João Távora, 2017/08/18
- bug#24901: Caught mistake in elec-pair.el patch, Noam Postavsky, 2017/08/18