[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-function
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:28:21 +0300 |
> From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
> Cc: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>, 28412@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:12:01 -0700
>
> Also, there don't appear to be any built-in functions or regexps for
> dealing with "hidden" buffers, I'm assuming:
>
> (not (string-prefix-p " " (buffer-name buffer)))
>
> is okay?
Yes, but I think aref would be simpler (and probably faster).
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, (continued)
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/09/18
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Kaushal Modi, 2017/09/18
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/09/18
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Kaushal Modi, 2017/09/18
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/19
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Kaushal Modi, 2017/09/25
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/19
- bug#28412: 26.0.50; Let save-some-buffers accept write-contents-functions,
Eli Zaretskii <=