[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions pr
From: |
Winston |
Subject: |
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:07 EDT |
Re: using completion-ignore-case to control both completions and
xref-find-definitions
Dmitry previously commented:
> We can do that without an extra variable, though, by making
> definitions search be controlled by completion-ignore-case.
Unless you want to argue that xref-find-definitions is a
"completion", doing that would mean that completion-ignore-case has an
unexpected side-effect (namely, that it affects a function that is not a
"completion"). On programming aesthetic grounds, then, I'd argue that
xref-ignore-case (or whatever you want to call it) would be better.
-WBE
- bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions, (continued)
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt, Winston, 2017/09/14
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent, Winston, 2017/09/14
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt,
Winston <=