bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#29104: [PATCH]: xterm-mouse-mode clicks in the modeline dont use the


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#29104: [PATCH]: xterm-mouse-mode clicks in the modeline dont use the keymap properties of the modeline strings
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:52:56 +0200

> From: Olaf Rogalsky <olaf.rogalsky@t-online.de>
> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:47:28 +0100
> 
> I would like to give some more details on the patch and which problem it
> tries to solve.
> 
> Ultimately I try to get better support of the mouse under xterm. The
> following features currently do not work with the mouse under xterm:
> 
> 1. Mouse clicks on menu-bar always brings up the left-most menu, but not
>    the menu under the spot.
>    
> 2. A mouse click on the mode-line activates the window, but does not
>    trigger the local-map property on the spot.
> 
> 3. When moving the mouse over some text with a mouse-face property or
>    help-echo property nothing happens, because xterm-mouse-mode does not
>    receive any mouse motion events from the controlling xterm (except
>    during dragging operations).
> 
> I haven't looked into (1), but I am testing a solution for (2) and (3).
> 
> This patch (#29104) addresses (2). It does not implement a new feature,
> but tries to make a bugfix to keyboard.c:read_key_sequence. This
> function is a 900 lines nightmare of spaggheti code, full of global
> state and goto's. At least it is somehow documented.
> 
> But here we go, this is what I understood so far:
> 
> The function reads input characters until some keybinding is found or
> until the sequence does not form a prefix key sequence anymore. If the
> trailing characters, which have been read so far, form a sequence in a
> translation keymap (input-decode-map, key-translation-map,
> local-function-key-map), those trailing characters are replaced by the
> binding of the translation map.  Thereafter a jump back close to the
> beginning of the function is made and all events up to the replacement
> event are reinterpreted again.
> 
> Such jumps ("goto replay_sequence;") take place immediately after the
> lines, which I introduced in the patch.  When replaying the sequence,
> the variable "first_event" will be used to select the currently active
> keymaps (line 9035).  In case, that the first characters are bound in a
> key translation map, first_event still holds (incrorrectly, as I
> presume) the first character of the translation sequence and not its
> binding.
> 
> My patch takes place after a key translation has been performed.  It
> checks, that the key translation is not empty, (or more precisely, that
> the current event sequence is not empty),
> 
>            first_event = mock_input > 0 ? keybuf[0] : Qnil;  
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> and if so, sets the variable first_event to the first event in the
> sequence.
> 
>            first_event = mock_input > 0 ? keybuf[0] : Qnil;  
>                                           ^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Here, all key translations where allready replaced by their
> corresponding binding.  If the current event sequence is empty,
> first_event is set to Qnil, which means that the default active keymaps
> should be used. This would be the case, if the raw key sequence was
> bound to an empty vector in a translation map.
> 
>            first_event = mock_input > 0 ? keybuf[0] : Qnil;  
>                                                       ^^^^
> 
> Now back to my original problem: mouse clicks in the mode line do not
> work correctly. xterm-mouse-mode uses the input-decode-map to translate
> special character sequences coming from xterm (starting with "\e[") into
> proper mouse events.  Without the patch, first_event is set to ?\e.
> Therefore the esc-map is used to find a binding for the mouse event,
> which of cause does not work as intended. With the patch, first_event is
> set to the mouse event and the binding in the local-map property will be
> found.
> 
> Et vola, mouse clicks in the mode line will work :-)

Stefan, any comments?  I'm thinking of installing this on master.

Thanks.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]