[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:54:52 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Why is this different from "… &optional ,@optargs” in a similar form, when
> optargs could have no elements? Rejecting that was (part of) the point of
> Noam’s change (and the previous change for bug 24913).
It's not, and I also think rejecting it is generally unadvisable unless
it has a performance impact.
> I think I’ve already made my objection to that part plain, but it
> seems like rejecting an empty &optional and accepting an empty &aux
> would be inconsistent.
Inconsistency is part of life, tho.
Stefan