bug#30207: 27.0.50; [PATCH] other-window-for-scrolling returns window on daemon frame

[Noam Postavsky]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> I can't imagine a scenario where I would want to scroll a frame on a
> different terminal, so I personally prefer the bug#56160-style
> restriction to the current terminal for both its semantic and syntactic
> simplicity.

I believe some people use Emacs in a single-window-per-frame style and
manage the frames via the window manager, so scrolling in other
terminals sounds useful for that kind of scenario.

> OTOH, the other two approaches preserve established behaviour and also
> have the following merits:
>
> 1. Ignoring the daemon frame acts as a reminder to review the daemon
>    frame visibility issue discussed in bug#27210.

Thanks for reminding us about it.  :)

I'm still of the opinion that the daemon frame should be marked
invisible (what with it being not visible and all).