[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:00:12 -0700 (PDT) |
> > > > The doc string should not list the functions that run the hook.
> > >
> > > Why not?
> >
> > Same reason we don't do that elsewhere (do we?).
>
> I see no reason for such a stringent consistency.
No, there's no need for a stringent consistency.
That's generally true.
> Of course not. But in this case doing that makes sense.
> Because it tells one indirectly what changes are considered to "update
> the buffer list".
OK. Thanks for thinking about it.