Re: feature req for diff

[Paul Eggert]

> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 01:37:26 +0100 (CET)
> From: Koblinger Egmont <address@hidden>
> 
> Ohh, this sub-second timestamp sounds new to me. But I hope that as soon
> there's a libc-api to ask the sub-second of the timestamp (is there?), cp
> will soon support it.

>From my point of view the hard part is the libc-api; can you arrange
for that to happen?

> Does diff check the inode and if it's the same, then skip this file?

Yes, in the typical case where no differences mean no output.