[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:59:18 +0200 |
At 02:37 -0800 2002/04/05, Paul Eggert wrote:
>I wasn't so much worried about people using yytranslate in their own
>code (they deserve what they get; it's private). I was worried about
>how 'bison' would output a yytranslate that will work on an EBCDIC
>host, even when 'bison' itself is running on an ASCII host. This
>issue is independent of the pointer-versus-int issue.
Is this cross compiler problem common?
-- Note that the problem does not exist for Unicode UTF-n encodings, n >=
21, as those are the same on all platforms.
If one really needs to have your feature, there are two solutions: "Akim",
i.e., do not use the Bison char feature. Or having normally unsorted tables
with entries of the form
{ 'a', n }
Then this file will properly translated.
Note that one may want to use the yytranslate[] table as is if one is using
distributed programming, say a WWW-browser reading ASCII on an EBCDIC
computer.
Hans Aberg
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, (continued)
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/03
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Miles Bader, 2002/04/03
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/08
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/08
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/08
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/08
Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/02