[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gettext
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: gettext |
Date: |
25 Jul 2002 19:29:57 +0900 |
address@hidden (Stepan Kasal) writes:
> | Running `make install' with a different value of `prefix' from the
> | one used to build the program should _not_ recompile the program.
>
> I'd say that "re-compile the program" means complete re-building according
> to the new prefix. If the standard said "... should not re-compile nor
> re-link any part of the program.", it would be clearer.
> With current wording of GCS, I think that this is not a violation.
The important point, as I understand it, is that `make install' with a
different prefix should _not_ embed the new prefix in anything that gets
installed -- all embedded paths should still use the old prefix.
I suppose it's OK to violate the letter of the rule as long as you're
quite sure that the end effect is the same.
-Miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'
- Re: gettext, (continued)
- Re: gettext, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/07/16
- Re: gettext, Russ Allbery, 2002/07/16
- Re: gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/07/24
- Re: gettext, Russ Allbery, 2002/07/24
- Re: gettext, Stepan Kasal, 2002/07/25
- Re: gettext, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/07/25
- Re: gettext, Stepan Kasal, 2002/07/25
- Re: gettext,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: gettext, Stepan Kasal, 2002/07/25
- Re: gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/07/26
- Re: gettext, Russ Allbery, 2002/07/26
- Re: gettext, Russ Allbery, 2002/07/26
- Re: gettext, Russ Allbery, 2002/07/25
Re: gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/07/16