[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sed or regex bug?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: Sed or regex bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:25:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 02:30:55AM -0700, Vartan Stepanian wrote:
> echo "hi"|sed -e 's/[\(a\)\(b\)]//'
> Now assume the following for "a":
> \(\(\(\(\([0-9]\+\)\)\)\?x\(\([\^]\([0-9]\+\)\)\)\?\)\)
> it parses by itself.
> Now why can't I substitute a and b into this
> expression: [\(a\)\(b\)]
between brackets, ie. `[' and `]', there have to be a list of characters.
Thus even your first example seems unreasonable.
So this is not a bug but misunderstanding on your side.
Consult your man pages.
HTH,
Stepan Kasal
- Sed or regex bug?, Vartan Stepanian, 2002/10/05
- Re: Sed or regex bug?,
Stepan Kasal <=