RE: sed

[Brett . A . Cook]

Thanks to everyone for your help.  I was unaware that there was a 4.x
version for DOS, and was thus stuck with the 3.x behaviour.  Thanks again
for the quick response.

-Brett


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:00 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: Brett A Cook; address@hidden
Subject: Re: sed

Hello Andreas,

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:36:33PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:26:22AM -0600, address@hidden
wrote:
> >> I'm trying to use 'sed' version 3.02 with the following command line
on
> >> dos:
> >> sed -e "s/ /\n/g" my_file
> 
> What's wrong with
> 
> $ sed -e 's/ /\
> /g' ...
> 
> ?

the original poster mentioned dos, so I supposed he uses command.com

Stepan