[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gawk infinity issues
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: gawk infinity issues |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:20:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Paul Eggert scripsit:
> "Andrew J. Schorr" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > How do you establish what is "historical practice"?
>
> It depends on the context, but here I am referring to the way awk
> behaved before people started futzing with strtod. 1979, say.
In that case, a --traditional switch or TRADITIONAL environment variable
could be used to preserve the old behavior. In 1979, inf and nan were
not part of the floating-point landscape.
Furthermore, I don't think it's very good awk style to depend on the
numeric value of a digit-free string.
--
Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers John Cowan
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is http://www.reutershealth.com
Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus. address@hidden
- Re: gawk infinity issues, (continued)
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Aharon Robbins, 2006/01/05
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Andrew J. Schorr, 2006/01/06
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/06
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Andrew J. Schorr, 2006/01/06
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/06
- Re: gawk infinity issues,
John Cowan <=
- Re: gawk infinity issues, Andrew J. Schorr, 2006/01/07
Re: gawk infinity issues, Aharon Robbins, 2006/01/08