[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again
From: |
Andreas Gruenbacher |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:27:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Monday, 16 March 2009 22:52:13 Karl Berry wrote:
> we would still end up with mixed line endings in new vs. existing
> files.
>
> Yes, I understand, but at least the results are comprehensible, and I
> think in nearly all cases, the results are what are actually desired.
> IMHO.
>
> Requiring to turn off the trailing CR heuristic
> explicitly on the command line prevents this aberration.
>
> So in those few cases where people want to force line endings one way or
> the other, they can specify an option.
Let me restate: I want patch to default to native line endings on each platform
unless instructed to take patches literally (--binary), in which case no
transformation happens. That way the common case will work, there will be fewer
surprises because there is less guessing, and patch won't thwart attempts to
achieve non-standard behaviors, either.
Thanks,
Andreas
- Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/17
- Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Mike Frysinger, 2009/03/15
- Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/17
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/15
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/17
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/16
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again,
Andreas Gruenbacher <=
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Karl Berry, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/18
- Re: [bug-patch] Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Micah Cowan, 2009/03/19
Re: patch troubles with CRLF's again, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2009/03/17