[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] strange double in match
From: |
Achim Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] strange double in match |
Date: |
11 Jun 2002 03:49:17 +0200 |
Am Die, 2002-06-11 um 03.05 schrieb Joseph Heled:
So, it is reproducable? I have another problem (maybe it occurs because
of my lack understanding gnubg):
1. When I use same settings for playing amd analysing gnubg nevertheless
critizes its own cube decision. Why?
2. See this position for example:
Match to 7: X (gnubg) needs 2, O (me) needs 6, cube centered.
GNU Backgammon Position ID: 19wEgBFsns0CAA
Match ID : MAHgAFAACAAA
+24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+
| O O O O O | | O |
| O O O O | | |
| O O | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |v
| | | |
| X | | |
| X | | |
| X X O X | | X X X |
| O X X O X | | X X X X |
+-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+
Gnubg doubles in the match. Evaluating later gnubg says (of course) nd,
take.
I'm confused.
> However, changing this requires a lot of work, because I have to rebuild a net
> for both cases. My linux laptop has fried it's motherboard (only 1.5 years
> old,
> out of warranty), so I am not sure when I can continue working on that
> because I
> am not going to pay 2400$NZ to fix it when a new one costs about the same ...
If it's just a problem of calculating power you may use my athlon. I
also burned a mainboard a few weeks ago. The new one seems to be stable
and "cool enough".
Ciao
Achim
--
achim mueller, anne-frank-str. 25, D-48431 rheine
+49 (0)5971 83767, +49 (0)163 8458340
address@hidden address@hidden
Re: [Bug-gnubg] strange double in match, Gary Wong, 2002/06/11