bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] strange double in match


From: Achim Mueller
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] strange double in match
Date: 11 Jun 2002 03:49:17 +0200

Am Die, 2002-06-11 um 03.05 schrieb Joseph Heled:

So, it is reproducable? I have another problem (maybe it occurs because
of my lack understanding gnubg):

1. When I use same settings for playing amd analysing gnubg nevertheless
critizes its own cube decision. Why?

2. See this position for example:

Match to 7: X (gnubg) needs 2, O (me) needs 6, cube centered.

GNU Backgammon  Position ID: 19wEgBFsns0CAA
                 Match ID   : MAHgAFAACAAA
    +24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+
    | O  O  O     O  O |   |    O             |
    | O     O     O  O |   |                  |
    | O           O    |   |                  |
    |                  |   |                  |
    |                  |   |                  |
    |                  |BAR|                  |v
    |                  |   |                  |
    |                X |   |                  |
    |                X |   |                  |
    |       X  X  O  X |   |    X  X     X    |
    |    O  X  X  O  X |   |    X  X     X  X |
    +-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+


Gnubg doubles in the match. Evaluating later gnubg says (of course) nd,
take.

I'm confused.

> However, changing this requires a lot of work, because I have to rebuild a net
> for both cases. My linux laptop has fried it's motherboard (only 1.5 years 
> old,
> out of warranty), so I am not sure when I can continue working on that 
> because I
> am not going to pay 2400$NZ to fix it when a new one costs about the same ...

If it's just a problem of calculating power you may use my athlon. I
also burned a mainboard a few weeks ago. The new one seems to be stable
and "cool enough".

Ciao

Achim
 
-- 
achim mueller, anne-frank-str. 25, D-48431 rheine
+49 (0)5971 83767, +49 (0)163 8458340
address@hidden address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]