[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?
From: |
Jim Segrave |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:52:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue 06 Aug 2002 (19:41 +0000), Joern Thyssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just checked in some code that changes the way the HTML export
> produces links in the header.
>
> Instead of
>
> <a href="/home/jth/prog/gnubg-bugfix/bla.html">
>
> it now produces
>
> <a href="bla.html">
>
> with the use of basename from libgen.h.
>
> However, I'm quite unsure whether libgen.h is standard or not?!
>
> Does anyone know?
Yes - any current Unix should have it:
See
<http://www.opengroup.org/austin/ifacetables/t_headtable.html>
Posix says it's X/Open System Interface standard
<http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_439>
--
Jim Segrave address@hidden
- [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Gary Wong, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?,
Jim Segrave <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Øystein Johansen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/12