bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2


From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:23:03 +1300

Morten Wang wrote:
> 
> * Douglas Zare
> > I look forward to seeing gnu 2-ply rollout data, to see if gnu 2-ply
> > plays this one better than Snowie 3.
> 
> after having checked both the position and my settings to make sure
> they were all correct I can now post the 2-ply rollout results:
> 
> Win     (g)     (bg)    L(g)    L(bg)   Cubeless        Cubeful
> 0.1621  0.0000  0.0000  0.0652  0.0123  -0.7533         n/a
> 0.0011  0.0000  0.0000  0.0006  0.0002   0.0022         n/a
> 
> (21600 trials, no truncation, seed 11, w/rotate rolls & variance
> reduction, world class settings w/o cubeful chequer eval, cubeless
> rollout and the Jacoby rule turned off)
> 
> Morten!
> 
> --
> "...a liquid which was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea."
>   My opinions are not necessarily those of my provider,
>   not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Can you see if you have disabled 1 ply pruning? (i.e. enabled "No 1-ply
pruning")

It is under Settings/Evaluation/Chequer Play

After you do so, can you run the rollout again? Just start with a low number of
trials and see if it made a difference.

-Joseph




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]