Re: [Bug-gnubg] My Ideas for move filters

[Joern Thyssen]

On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, address@hidden wrote
> 
> Notice in the moves limit I have only mentioned a single number instead of  
> always accept x moves and add extra.
> I think you should have the option to set always accept to 0  as there isn't 
> much point evaluating a minimum number of moves if the top play at the 
> previous ply is way ahead of the second choice.

Perhaps not for gnubg finding it's best move, but for analysis or hint
it might be nice to see a least two moves evaluating on the given
setting.

So that calls for two sets of predefined filters: one for playing and
one for analysis/hint?!

However, maybe you're right: we could add 0 as an acceptable value for
"accept"? (implementation: use "-1" to signal a disabled movefilter).

Jørn