bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Grade thresholds


From: Albert Silver
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Grade thresholds
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:33:12 -0300

I'll do it, but you have to promise not to blame me for eye-sore caused
from viewing them. :-)

                                                Albert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joern Thyssen [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:38 PM
> To: Albert Silver
> Cc: 'GNUBackgammon bug reporting'
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Grade thresholds
> 
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:35:22AM -0300, Albert Silver wrote
> > I received another query on GNU's generosity in its grades
> > (Supernatural, World Class, etc.) by a strong Brazilian player I
> > introduced to GNU. He loves it, and has commented on how much faster
it
> > is to analyze matches or do rollouts with, but noted that it seemed
more
> > generous in its grades than Snowie 4. I can pass the e-mail to you,
but
> > should note it's in Portuguese.
> >
> > I'd like to pass on two possible requests therefore:
> >
> > 1) just tighten the thresholds by a notch, so that Supernatural is
at
> > 0.04, WC at 0.08, etc.
> 
> I would really like to see some statistical material on how the error
> rate in Snowie relates to gnubg. In principle they should be identical
> if the bot's played alike, but the matches I've seen they're very
> different.
> 
> If someone has a huge number of matches analysed with both Snowie and
> gnubg I would really like to see a table with Snowie error rate vs
gnubg
> error rate. Perhaps 50 or so matches should do -- preferably between
> human players.
> 
> From this table we could calculate the approximate conversion factor,
> and use it on the Snowie thresholds.
> 
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) Allow users to customize the thresholds if they like, such as is
> > possible for the move-by-move error thresholds.
> >
> > One might argue that this last option would mean sharing results
would
> > give incompatible results, but frankly I don't spend my time passing
> > results around nor do I believe others do, so I don't think it's
much of
> > an issue.
> 
> I really don't like that, because of the incompatible results.
> 
> Jørn






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]