[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug tracker: Forwarding of postings

From: Holger
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug tracker: Forwarding of postings
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:45:13 +0200

At 11:32 27.06.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:06:45PM +0200, Holger wrote
> Firstly, I was wondering whether it is in any way different, although I
> didn't really suppose it to be. What should be so special about your
> address over the list's?

The list may filter certain mails, e.g., to exclude malconfigured
auto-reponses from people on vacation etc.

I noticed the following header:

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=4.0

meaning that some spam filter rates this mails as being very close to

Ah, so the problem with the erratic posting is not due to Savannah but our mailing list. Who can configure this? I guess it's enough to set address@hidden on the white list.

> There should probably be an option (check box) in the
> administration whether to forward a particular update or not.

Yes, it's possible to control this for the different "roles", e.g., do
not forward to CC persons when, say, the bug is closed. For the global
email notification, you only have the option "send on all updates".

My idea was more simple minded so that it would involve human consideration. Just a check box where the developer decides whether it's worthwhile forwarding to the list or not, default to on.

It's a pity that these options are limited to personal configuration only. I've thought about (mis)using it as global, but this probably doesn't work.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]