RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Tutorial 2.00 - Comments

[Albert Silver]

> Alos I think it's better to agree on _one_ source document within the
> gnubg project. If you like, you can keep track on html, doc, rtf und
> pdf, but I'm too busy looking at every document twice a week. For the
> basic documentation it's easier to use texi, even more, when a few
> people are working on it independently.

Well, this will be new, since until now I have been the only person
working on it. I have no problem with more people on it, but would like
to guarantee the standard of quality. By standard I mean quality of
language, style, document structure, and of course diagrams used to
supplement the descriptions.

                                                Albert

> 
> Ciao
> 
> Achim
> 
> 
> --
> Achim Mueller
> Linux Systems Administrator
> 
> on behalf of:
> Dresdener Kleinwort Wasserstein
> Dresdener Bank AG
> Global Business Services       <mailto:address@hidden>
> IT Operational Integrity       +49 69 263 85152 (97400 - 85152)
> Jürgen-Ponto-Platz 1           +49 69 263 16994 (97400 - 16994)
> D-60301 Frankfurt
> 
> Linux Admin Team:       <mailto: address@hidden>
> Linux Support Team:     <mailto: address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
> disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
> http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------