[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted! |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:28:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:11:27AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
>
>
> Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:22:28AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
> >
> >
> >So which of gnubg's function would you be most interested in?
> >
>
> I don't think it matters. If you start by providing the basic stuff to
> get Øystein batch stuff going, it will be great.
>
> Say,
>
> gnubg.import(name)
> gnubg.match.analyze()
> gnubg.match.save(name)
>
> (names are only a suggestion)
These are already high-level commands in gnubg, and can be reached
through
gnubg.command("import mat blah.mat")
gnubg.command("analyse match")
gnubg.command("save match blah.sgf")
Do we want "native" python equivalents as well?
Jørn
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Holger, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joseph Heled, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Jim Segrave, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joseph Heled, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!, Joseph Heled, 2003/07/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!,
Joern Thyssen <=