|
From: | Holger |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, exit code 03 |
Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:37:21 +0200 |
At 19:12 25.07.2003 +0200, Holger wrote:
At 15:45 25.07.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:I'm just guessing here: Try without notification -- you're probably sending notifications to port 80 on localhost which is the slave... you should send notifications to the master. You can also use different ports, i.e., let the master listen on port 2000 and the slave on port 3000.Without notifications it doesn't exit, but neither does the right thing: (No game) pu slave Host set to SLAVE mode. Hit ^C to kill pending tasks and return to MASTER mode. Available processing units: Id Type Status Queue Tasks Address 1 Local Ready 1 rollout analysis n/aTasks (todo/prog/done) Rollouts (rcvd/sent/fail) Evals (rcvd/sent/fail) Status0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) N/A 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) N/A0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) Waiting for0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) N/A Host set back to MASTER mode. (Interrupted) (No game)
After some more changes I now get endlessly (for "pu slave"):0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) 0 ( 0/ 0/ 0) Waiting for *** RPU refused connection on local IP address 255.255.255.255 from remote IP ad
dress 255.255.255.255. This is because RPU_AcceptConnection fails.Shouldn't just open a socket and wait until a master's going to connect if I set it to slave mode? I guess I'd have to ask once more how the procedure for setup is. So far I assume that I put one instance of gnubg into slave mode like above (without notification). Then I "pu add remote slaveaddr:2000" on the host and they should find each other. Correct?
With notifications I had tried different configurations, but it stays all the same. I've tried withpu slave * pu slave localhost:3000 pu slave localhost All exit with code 03.
No change. Regards,Holger
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |