[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows
From: |
Olivier Baur |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:36:17 +0200 |
Le mardi, 29 juil 2003, à 17:19 Europe/Paris, Holger a écrit :
Btw, do you have access to any Windows PC for testing?
No, I don't.
I've just started looking at the source.
I've corrected some typos, obviously due to some copy/paste of some
added WIN32 #if-guarded code.
I've also defined SOCKET to int in the non-WIN32 case to simplify parts
like:
#ifdef WIN32
SOCKET s;
#else
int s;
#endif
From the output log you provided, it seems that the accept() call in
Slave() doesn't succeed. I've fixed a bug on line 3609 that prevented
gnubg from displaying the error in that case.
I've just committed the changes; can you try to compile and run it,
please?
I also see that you have commented out many calls to
gdk_threads_enter()/gdk_threads_leave() in real_main(); now my
gnubg-multi freezes at startup :-) These calls are necessary once the
GDK lock is inited; why did you comment them out?
-- Olivier
- [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Holger, 2003/07/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Olivier Baur, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Holger, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Olivier Baur, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Holger, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Holger, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows,
Olivier Baur <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Holger, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Jim Segrave, 2003/07/29
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-multi on Windows, Joseph Heled, 2003/07/29