[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] Proper Credits
From: |
Albert Silver |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] Proper Credits |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:31:39 -0300 |
Forgive me if this goes twice, but I'm having trouble with my e-mail today,
so I'm sending this again from my Hotmail account -->
This was posted in the GammonLine forum which I am forwarding to the mailing
list:
Well, I don't feel like doing all of the mathematical homework for the gnu
team, particularly given how many of my ideas and suggestions have been
absorbed by gnu without any attribution to me whatsoever. But to reiterate,
it is wrong to imagine that a variable stopping point, triggered by 2.33 jsd
(or that combined with a fixed minimum number of trials), gives the same
confidence as a 2.33 jsd result with a fixed stopping point. I ran some
experiments and posted some of the results here earlier. Use more than 2.33.
Douglas Zare
------------------------------------------------------
In the forum I responded:
I'm sure no intention was meant to step on any toes. In the list of changes
for example, you'll always see credit attributed to the originator of an
idea on top of the programmer responsible for implementing it. Perhaps you
could delineate a few of these ideas so that proper credit can be given?
I'll forward this message to the GNUBG mailing list as this is a serious
comment and should be addressed.
Albert
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger: instale grĂ¡tis e converse com seus amigos.
http://messenger.msn.com.br