RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs

[Ian Shaw]

>From address@hidden
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:59 AM
> To: bug-gnubg
> Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
> 
> I tried  100 5pt 0ply matches woolsey.xml  agains snowie.xml. 
>  Analysing
> with  woolsey at  0ply a  rating discrepancy  of 2193  +-8  
> resulted (as
> estimated by the "error rate"). Again totally negligible.
> 

That was quick. Very interesting information. If anything was going to
show up, I'd expect it in Woolsey vs Snowie. I need to rethink how much
accuracy one needs when determining a MET.

--
Ian