[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question
From: |
Nardy Pillards |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:04:17 +0200 |
On 16 Oct 2003 at 18:13, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:47PM +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote
> > On 16 Oct 2003 at 13:00, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >
> > > It works fine for me with an older windows build.
> >
> > Yeah....
> > Must be the same thing causing MET not to be loaded?
>
> No, I don't think so.
>
> .gnubgautorc and .gnubgrc are read from the home directory, which have
> not (yet) been changed. Besides, the code is:
>
> sprintf( sz, "%s/.gnubgautorc", szHomeDirectory );
>
> if( ( pf = fopen( sz, "r" ) ) ) {
> LoadCommands( pf, sz );
> fclose( pf );
> }
>
> sprintf( sz, "%s/.gnubgrc", szHomeDirectory );
>
> if( ( pf = fopen( sz, "r" ) ) ) {
> LoadCommands( pf, sz );
> fclose( pf );
> }
>
> I have a hard time imagining that reading .gnubgautorc succeeds and
> .gnubgrc fails, since the code is completely analogous.
>
> Jørn
>
Yes....
My error.
set message off (and hit ENTER)
does the job.
(I copied a command sequence to .gnubgrc, and that one was read
nicely. Then remembered there need to be a CR after the last command)
--
Louis Nardy Pillards
"It's better to light a candle, than to curse the darkness"
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnu question, Holger, 2003/10/17