[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions)
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2004 19:52:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:41:49AM -0700, Richard Anderson wrote
> I think Options is a better label than Settings, since this conforms to
> Windows UI standards. I notice that there has been a commendable effort in
> gbg to conform to some Windows UI standards; I'd like to see this taken
> further. I realize that some of the Windows UI standards may not be ideal,
> but when third party apps follow the existing standard it flattens the
> user's learning curve enormously.
The primary target of GNU Backgammon is GNU/Hurd or GNU/Linux, so in
general we should not try to conform to MS Windows UI standards unless
they happen to coincide with their open source equivalent.
Jørn
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), (continued)
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Øystein Johansen, 2004/05/16
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Ian Shaw, 2004/05/17
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Ian Shaw, 2004/05/17
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Ian Shaw, 2004/05/17
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Øystein Johansen, 2004/05/17
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Richard Anderson, 2004/05/17
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions),
Joern Thyssen <=
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Good beta release! (Suggestions), Øystein Johansen, 2004/05/17