[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface
From: |
Marco van Tol |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 13:44:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Jon Kinsey wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure about using python to access the database. It wasn't a
> problem as there is a pysqlite module, I just don't think it's
> necessary. To put it another way, it adds a dependency that isn't
> strictly required. I imagine the code could easily be changed so that
> the database access is in the C layer and the python code changed to use
> this. Is there any other reason to use python for this?
Perhaps more to give a signal of life then to contribute something useful:
I'm a bit curious to know the answer to this as well. :)
I actually currently compile gnubg on my FreeBSD machine with
'WITHOUT_PYTHON' so it doesn't consume _all available cpu_ even while not
really doing anything. Not sure if that's FreeBSD specific though.
Marco
--
Marco van Tol