bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface


From: Marco van Tol
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:44:24 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Jon Kinsey wrote:

[...]

> I'm not sure about using python to access the database.  It wasn't a 
> problem as there is a pysqlite module, I just don't think it's 
> necessary.  To put it another way, it adds a dependency that isn't 
> strictly required.  I imagine the code could easily be changed so that 
> the database access is in the C layer and the python code changed to use 
> this.  Is there any other reason to use python for this?

Perhaps more to give a signal of life then to contribute something useful:
I'm a bit curious to know the answer to this as well. :)

I actually currently compile gnubg on my FreeBSD machine with
'WITHOUT_PYTHON' so it doesn't consume _all available cpu_ even while not
really doing anything. Not sure if that's FreeBSD specific though.

Marco

-- 
Marco van Tol




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]