RE: [Bug-gnubg] Proposed patches to the gnubg sources

[macherius]

> > weird stuff like gcc for Sinix on MIPS. Checkout, compile and face 
> > dozens of unnecessary warnings and errors. Is it really required to 
> > have such oddities, in particular where the patches to gnubg are 
> > there, and come at no cost?
> 
> I'm not that bothered to be fair.  Perhaps if the #if also 
> checked _MSC_VER - i.e. is the microsoft compiler being used 
> it would be ok.
 
Fine with me, all I want is a clean compile right after CVS checkout. I'd
opt to also add the Intel compiler, which defines "__INTEL_COMPILER". I'll
submit a patch checking for both Windows  compilers here soon. That would
then replace the pending patch submitted earlier w/r to the OpenGL includes.

Ingo