[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things
From: |
Jim Segrave |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:30:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
I've just done the mods to Makefile.in/am to add gtkfile to the top
level 4zMakefiles and to add catalog.xml/catalog.dtd to the
met/Makefiles.
While I was at it, I replaced all the C++ style comments with C
comments, cleared various small compiler warnings and added CVS Id
tags to all the .c and .h files which had them missing.
Compiles under FreeBSD now only generate warnings for type punning
with pointers (hard to get rid of), an inlined virtual function in a
FTGL header file and Pythons use of tmpname()
For systems where a file off_t or a time_t won't fit when cast to
unsigned longs, some printfs will be peculiar, but they used long ints
to print without casting before, which is even riskier.
I can't test that Makefile.am will build a valid makefile, as I have
not been able to find a working set of autoconf/automake/autoheader
which will work with gnubg for the last year or so.
--
Jim Segrave address@hidden
- [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things,
Jim Segrave <=
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, macherius, 2005/02/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, Jim Segrave, 2005/02/23
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, macherius, 2005/02/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, Jim Segrave, 2005/02/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, Holger, 2005/02/23
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] probable fixes for catalog and gtkfile things, macherius, 2005/02/23
- [Bug-gnubg] GTK 2.6.2 Testbuild und Win95 ?, macherius, 2005/02/23