[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Colour moves depending on equity?

From: Ian Shaw
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Colour moves depending on equity?
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:49:23 +0100

> From: Jon Kinsey
> Sent: 01 September 2005 19:59
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Colour moves depending on equity?
> Here's some example screen shots:
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jon_kinsey/bg/list8.png
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jon_kinsey/bg/list9.png
> The first being just the move rank that's highlighted, the 
> second the entire first line.
> I think the first looks best as it's less garish, also it 
> will be difficult to display the selected move if the whole 
> line is changed.
I agree totally that the first is best. When you highlight the whole
line, it disassociates the moves from the win breakdown you've worked so
hard to integrate; you'd have to shade the breakdown too.

Have you gone for shading on relative equity, or on analysis thresholds?
It's not clear from your screenshots. The more I think about, the more
I'm convinced that the latter is better.

What will you do if the actual move is poor? You don't want to end up
with red on red.

-- Ian

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]