bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Problems with the recent changes regarding sounds


From: Jonathan Kinsey
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Problems with the recent changes regarding sounds
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:33:58 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0

Christian Anthon wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Jonathan Kinsey <address@hidden> wrote:
>> More generally I don't like #if blocks - they tend to make the code
>> tricky to maintain (when used excessively).  Is there any real overhead
>> of compiling the sound code (and turning the sound off)?  Similarly some
>> of the other blocks - time controls for example, could easily be
>> included in all builds?
>>
> 
> I agree that the code contains too many #if's. Here the sound code is
> fairly isolated, so blocking everything actually takes fewer #if's.
> 
> I wouldn't mind if the sound code was always included, but then we
> should make separate sound options for the cli and the gui.

Exactly - they should have separate options (and defaults).  I'm sure
they will at some point in the future...

Jon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]