[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multithreaded rollouts
From: |
Jonathan Kinsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multithreaded rollouts |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:14:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 |
Ian Shaw wrote:
>
>>>> I was amazed that the results of a couple of tests were
>> exactly the
>>>> same
>>>> (single/multithreaded) and got a bit under 90% speed
>> improvement on a
>>>> dual core machine.
>>>>
>>> Way to go, Jon!
>>>
>>> Mmmm, Dual Core... Must have dual core (drool).
>> I think you need a quad core really... I wouldn't rush out
>> and buy a new computer until it's been tested and shown to work...
>>
>
> Seriously, I am planning to upgrade my processor and memory quite soon. I'd
> like to get the most bang for my buck, so any advice would be appreciated. A
> quad core would exceed my budget, though.
>
> An Intel Core 2 Duo 1.86 GHz is about £115. A quad core costs £622. (Mind
> you, that is less than twice the price of the equivalent dual core 2.66 GHz
> dual core.)
>
> I've just noticed that a PentiumD with 2x3.4 GHz processors on one core is
> only £100. Seems like more GHz for less money, but I know you only get what
> you pay for. Would multi-threading work on this CPU? I haven't really kept
> track of hardware developments over the last few years, so I'm way out of
> touch.
>
> Does memory size affect performance much? I've always just gone with the
> standard cache size. Would altering it improve things, and what size change
> would make a difference?
I'm not an expert either. The "Intel Core 2 Duo 1.86 GHz" performs
better in benchmarks than the "PentiumD with 2x3.4 GHz". The
multi-threading would work on either, cache size may well be a factor as
well, I don't know how much of a factor though...
Jon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature