Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compilation errors when building gnubg on windows XP

[bar tomas]

Hi,

Thanks for your email.

I'd like to be able to compile gnubg myself because I would like to
play around with the maths functions and gnubg seems such a great open
platform for experimenting in this way.

But I don't need the graphical interface. Maybe thats what complicates the compilation.

So I'll try to compile the sources of the CLI without GTK, on cygwin.

Are these the steps to take?:


I downloaded and detared gnubg-source-MAIN-20070601.tar.gz


     ./configure --without-gtk2

     make

     make install


Thanks a lot for your help and patience.

On 7/8/07, Christian Anthon <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi,

you seem to have hit all the bugs. The last one I don't know what to
do about except to do proper debugging. Perhaps you should stick to
MaX's builds, unless you have very specific needs.

Christian.

On 7/6/07, bar tomas <address@hidden > wrote:
> You were right about libxml2.dll. I had another copy of the dll on my
> computer. I fixed that.
>  Now when I run the program it starts to initialize (the program window says
> 'initialising neural networks')but then it crashes with one of those windows
> error messages: 'the program has encountered a problem and needs to close'.
> When clicking on the debug button of the error screen I get 'Unhandled
> exception in gnubg.exe (MSVCRT.DLL): 0xC0000005: Access Violation'.
>  Would the building of the command line interface version of gnubg be less
> problematic? I don't really mind about not having the graphical interface,
> the CLI would be fine for me.
>  Thanks a lot.
>
>
> On 7/6/07, Christian Anthon <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 7/6/07, bar tomas <address@hidden > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >  Thanks for all your help.
> > >  I did as you suggested and  the compilation succeeded till the end.
> > >  But when I run the generated executable file ( gnubg.exe) I get the
> > > following error message:
> > >
> > >  Cannot find entry point of procedure xmlCatalogResolvePublic in dynamic
> > > link library  libxml2.dll
> > >
> > >  Any clues?
> > >  Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > That means that you have an older version of the libxml2.dll installed
> > on your system. Do a hard disk search for that file and we should be
> > able to help you.
> >
> > Christian.
> >
>
>