|
From: | Roy A. Crabtree |
Subject: | Not quite {was: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:28:24 -0400 |
Hi Peter,
GNU backgammon is a world class opponent and assumes, in a sense at
least, that your and its strengths are equal. GNU backgammon's doubles
are based on this assumption. So while it in a given position would
win e.g. 60% of the games when playing against itself, it is likely to
win e.g. 80% (or even 99%) of the games when playing against you.
Especially in a complicated position like the one you report.
The bottom line is keep studying, for example by enabling the build in
tutor function.
Christian.
On 8/19/07, Peter Carlson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why does gnu *almost* always recommend to take a double. I have noticed
> after playing literally hundreds of games against gnu that 99% of the
> time it recommends to take a double it is just plain WRONG! besides why
> would gnu offer a double if the odds weren't greatly in its favor to
> win??? here is just one example:
>
> Match MBlgARAAAAAA
> Position when 2x offered: bMdCgClwt4MBGA
> Position when I decided to resign: 7x8AAGB2NwiAAQ
>
> Peter
>
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |