RE: [Bug-gnubg] SIGIO, fAction, fnAction, HandleXAction

[Jonathan Kinsey]

Maybe I should have added that fAction is checked in some of the eval routines 
(and elsewhere) where the gui is already being refreshed (with fnTick for 
example).  So calling fnAction is redundant here.  I will remove these calls, 
just wondering if the other ones have any use.

Jon

> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:44:56 +0000
> Subject: [Bug-gnubg] SIGIO, fAction, fnAction, HandleXAction
>
>
> I'm looking at moving the stop button down to beside the progress bar, I'm 
> going to try and tidy up some of the code in this area, this is when I 
> stumbled upon the SIGIO stuff mentioned in the subject line.
>
> I'm not familiar with signals, and am not sure when SIGIO would be raised (I 
> guess something to due with sockets and terminals), can someone give some 
> examples?
>
> Jon
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!
> http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

_________________________________________________________________
Who's friends with who and co-starred in what?
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml