[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1

From: Massimiliano Maini
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:31:01 +0200

address@hidden wrote on 31/03/2008 13:16:41:

> >
> >  I think it's enough to just Tag the code?
> >
> >  Jon
> >
> If we are to follow your original suggestion about the road to 1.0,
> then tagging is the right way to do it. We are not planning to
> maintaining these sub-releases, but tagging them makes things easier
> to track.

My 2c: right now we don't need a separate branch.
The day we release v1.0 then we will.

The "1.0-stable" branch will be updated only with bugfixes while any other
new development will be done on the MAIN trunk only (the version could be named
2.0-devel or 2.0-pre or whatever).


The fact that the version number is in the configure file is annoying for
those not using the autoconf tool, e.g. me :)) (and others under Win).
Can't we put the version number directly into a .c/.h source file ?
backgammon.h ? gnubg.c ?
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]