> > I think it's enough to just Tag the code?
> > Jon
> If we are to follow your original suggestion about the road to 1.0,
> then tagging is the right way to do it. We are not planning to
> maintaining these sub-releases, but tagging them makes things easier
> to track.
My 2c: right now we don't need a separate branch. The day we release v1.0 then we will.
The "1.0-stable" branch will be updated
only with bugfixes while any other new development will be done on the MAIN trunk only
(the version could be named 2.0-devel or 2.0-pre or whatever).
P.S. The fact that the version number is in the configure
file is annoying for those not using the autoconf tool, e.g. me :)) (and
others under Win). Can't we put the version number directly into a .c/.h
source file ? backgammon.h ? gnubg.c ?