I guess you lostpasr of Bob's message
... what are 1D, 2C, 2D ?
Can you repost Bob's original message
?
MaX.
address@hidden
wrote on 11/08/2008 13:13:38:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm forwarding an e-mail by Bob Koca (he also tried to show me this
> behavior of gnubg whwn we met in Monte Calro):
>
> ***************************************************
> Here is a summary of some of the weird behavior I?ve noticed
when
> doing rollouts involving noise. I suspect it may just be an issue
of
> something being done in a wrong order. I used a 1 point match, zero
> skill position so the weakening of either player and the clicking
of
> cubeful on or off should not matter but it does. It is the latest
> build which I just downloaded today.
>
> In particular:
>
> Comparing 1A to 1C shows that if cubeful is on then weakening
one
> player can influence the result.
>
> Comparing 2C to 2D shows that if cubeful is off then determinsitc
or
> nondeterministic noise makes a difference. However this is not the
> case if cubeful is on as can be seen from comparing 1C to 1D.
>
> On a related issue it would be nice for the rollout results
to give
> more data. For example
>
> Whether the databases were being used, what type of noise was
used,
> what MEQ was used. Basically every setting that is alterable seems
> like it should be included in the summary.
>
> Thanks for any help, Bob Koca
>
> Player 1 = bobk Orange checkers on bottom
> Player 0 = gnubg White checkers on top
>
> Rollout of 15 on ace vs. 15 on ace 1 point match with various settings:
>
> All use no variance reduction, 1296 trials, quasi random dice,
no
> bearoff database, player 0 on roll, and seed = 1,000,000
>
> 1) Using CUBEFUL ON
> A) expert with cubeful eval checked vs expert with
cubeful eval checked
> win% of .658951 and s.d of .013173
> B) expert with cubeful eval off vs expert with cubeful eval
off
>
> same as A
>
> C) advanced (.015 det noise and cubeful eval) vs expert
> win % of .592607 and s.d of .011854
> ***************************************************
>
> Ciao
>
> Achim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg