> 2. I'm not sure gnubg uses 2ply for luck evaluation.
If it uses 0
> ply (as I remember,
> but I could be wrong, mabe it is 0ply just for match analysis luck
> evals), introducing
> your trick would cost something in terms of speed (actually, quite
> lot I would say,
> knowing that each additional ply cost more or less a factor 21). If
> somebody on gnubg
> mailing list can confirm that .... >
> By default luck is analyzed at 0 ply. You can set the plies manually
> set analysis luckanalysis plies <plies>
Right, but is this setting acting only on the luck
analysis (the luck adjusted result you see in the stats of an analyzed metch/session)
or also on the variance reduction algorithm ?