bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] Darwin-specific LDFLAGS in configure.in


From: Zulli, Louis P
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Darwin-specific LDFLAGS in configure.in
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:31:56 -0400 (EDT)

Hi Christian,

Regarding the following portion of configure.in:

  *-*-darwin*)
   LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -dylib_file /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib -framework QuickTime `/opt/local/bin/pkg-config --libs glib-2.0`"
    ;;

First, why use the -dylib_file option, given that its two path arguments are identical? Seems pointless to me. See the following portion of the ld man page:

-dylib_file install_name:file_name
                 Specifies that a dynamic shared library is in a different
                 location than its standard location. Use this option when you
                 link with a library that is dependent on a dynamic library,
                 and the dynamic library is in a location other than its
                 default location. install_name specifies the path where the
                 library normally resides. file_name specifies the path of the
                 library you want to use instead. For example, if you link to
                 a library that depends upon the dynamic library libsys and
                 you have libsys installed in a nondefault location, you would
                 use this option: -dylib_file /lib/lib-
                 sys_s.A.dylib:/me/lib/libsys_s.A.dylib.


Second, is the explicit pkg-config call necessary? I routinely remove it (and the -dylib_file option too) and no problems arise. Is this actually needed for folks for use MacPorts? (I don't have /opt/local )

I suppose "better safe than sorry" is a good philosophy to have, but while you are cleaning things up I thought I'd call this matter to your attention. Perhaps other Mac users who build from source can offer their insights.

Thanks,
Louis


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]