Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rollout results

[Joseph Heled]

I think keeping existing options is good - the one serious argument for removing them is when they become a (code) maintenance burden. Is that the case here?

This is separate from the issue of user interface/interaction. My personal preference is (I think) close to Ian. Show the full set once (the "default"), then list only deviations from it.

-Joseph

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:56 PM, motiv4u <address@hidden> wrote:

>        In the interest of compromise, I would not oppose the removal of the
> Ansi, BSD, and either the ISSAC or MD5. I would have to research those more
> to form a firm opinion. That would leave the Mersenne Twister, the Blum,
> Blum, & Shub, Random.org, manual dice, and the read from file. I am very
> opposed to removing all the generators besides Mersenne Twister and manual
> dice. I think that with some research into the various generators the list
> could be pared down but not as severely as Ian and Max suggest.
>
> -Myshkin

Please do keep the 'read from file'
If all others disappear, it'll give you at least the possibility to use them.

N>

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg